Reply to Anderson

Reply to B.O. Anderson et al

Interpolation processes in object perception: reply to Anderson (2007).

P. J. Kellman, P. Garrigan, & T. F. Shipley presented a theory of 3-D interpolation in object perception. Along with results from many researchers, this work supports an emerging picture of how the visual system connects separate visible fragments to form objects. In his commentary, B. L. Anderson challenges parts of that view, especially the idea of a common underlying interpolation component ...

The future of natural selection knowledge measurement: A reply to Anderson et al. (2010)

The development of rich, reliable, and robust measures of the composition, structure, and stability of student thinking about core scientific ideas (such as natural selection) remains a complex challenge facing science educators. In a recent article (Nehm & Schonfeld 2008), we explored the strengths, weaknesses, and insights provided by a detailed exploration of three commonly used measures of ...

Reply to Townes-Anderson: RPE65 gene therapy does not alter the natural history of retinal degeneration.

We appreciate the interest shown by TownesAnderson (1) in our article examining the natural history of retinal degeneration in Leber congenital amaurosis caused by retinal pigment epithelium-specific protein 65kDa (RPE65) mutations and evaluating the consequences of gene augmentation therapy (2). Townes-Anderson’s remarks focused on the final phrase of the last sentence of the Discussion of our...

The Authors’ Reply